[concurrency-interest] j.u.c/backport performance on Windows

Gregg Wonderly gregg at cytetech.com
Wed Apr 4 11:34:07 EDT 2007

Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Yes, this is basically what I am doing. Only I use a "custom" class
> for holding the result
> (http://www.chemaxon.com/shared/pkovacs/concurrent/processors/ScheduledWorkUnitData.java)
> instead of implementing the stock Future interface.

So it would seem that there probably are some OS related 'priority' and 
'scheduling' thing that might be changing the perceived performance.  Do you 
have a profiler to run the application with?  This might tell you a lot more 
about where the 'latency' is at.

Gregg Wonderly

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list