[concurrency-interest] j.u.c/backport performance on Windows
gregg at cytetech.com
Wed Apr 4 11:34:07 EDT 2007
Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Yes, this is basically what I am doing. Only I use a "custom" class
> for holding the result
> instead of implementing the stock Future interface.
So it would seem that there probably are some OS related 'priority' and
'scheduling' thing that might be changing the perceived performance. Do you
have a profiler to run the application with? This might tell you a lot more
about where the 'latency' is at.
More information about the Concurrency-interest